<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-geosci.net/inc/adgeo/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Geosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-geosci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7340</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7359</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<volume_title>1st Alexander von Humboldt International Conference</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/adgeo-6-57-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-geosci.net/6/57/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-geosci.net/6/57/2006/adgeo-6-57-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-geosci.net/6/57/2006/adgeo-6-57-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>57</start_page>
	<end_page>61</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-01-09</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">ENSO and sandy beach macrobenthos of the tropical East Pacific: some speculations</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>T. Vanagt</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>E. Beekman</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Vincx</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Degraer</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Gent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section, B-9000 Gent, Belgium</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The influence of the ENSO cycle on marine fauna and flora has only recently
been given the attention it deserves. The very strong 1997–1998 El Ni&amp;#241;o
and its obvious effects on marine biota was a key point in ENSO research,
but unfortunately few quantitative data about the 1997–1998 El Ni&amp;#241;o
itself are available.

&lt;P  style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;
To gather information about the effect of ENSO on the macrobenthos, we
performed a bi-weekly transect monitoring on an Ecuadorian sandy beach in
2000–2001, during the strong La Ni&amp;#241;a following the 1997–1998 El
Ni&amp;#241;o, and in the normal period of 2002–2004.

&lt;P  style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;
In this paper, intertidal macrofaunal densities at higher taxonomic level
are used to compare a La Ni&amp;#241;a phase with the &apos;normal&apos; situation. The few
existing documents about El Ni&amp;#241;o and sandy beach macrobenthos, and
scattered data from previous and current research, were used to complete the
picture.

&lt;P  style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;
Total macrobenthos densities were 300% lower during the La Ni&amp;#241;a phase
compared with equal months in the normal phase. Especially Crustacea and
Mollusca showed a marked increase in densities towards the normal situation
(94% and 341% respectively). Polychaeta and Echinodermata, however,
showed higher densities during the La Ni&amp;#241;a phase (22% and 73%
respectively).

&lt;P  style=&quot;line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;
Two possible explanations are proposed. (1) Low densities during the La
Ni&amp;#241;a could be due to the very strong preceding El Ni&amp;#241;o, suggesting
the populations were still recovering. This hypothesis is supported by
previous work done in the south of Peru. This is, however, a cold water
system, compared to the Ecuadorian warm water system. (2) The second
hypothesis states that a La Ni&amp;#241;a will have a very severe impact on the
intertidal macrofauna of a warm water system like the Ecuadorian coast.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

