<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-geosci.net/inc/adgeo/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Geosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-geosci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7340</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7359</eissn>
		<volume_number>27</volume_number>
		<volume_title>Hydrologic Modelling for the Assessment of Ecosystem Services and Landscape Functions</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2010</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/adgeo-27-11-2010</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-geosci.net/27/11/2010/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-geosci.net/27/11/2010/adgeo-27-11-2010.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-geosci.net/27/11/2010/adgeo-27-11-2010.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>11</start_page>
	<end_page>19</end_page>
	<publication_date>2010-08-23</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">From hydrological modelling to decision support</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>U. Haberlandt</name>
			<email>haberlandt@iww.uni-hannover.de</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institute of Water Resources Management, Hydrology and Agricultural Hydraulic Engineering, Leibniz University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Decision support for planning and management of water resources needs to
consider many target criteria simultaneously like water availability, water
quality, flood protection, agriculture, ecology, etc. Hydrologic models
provide information about the water balance components and are fundamental
for the simulation of ecological processes. Objective of this contribution is
to discuss the suitability of classical hydrologic models on one hand and of
complex eco-hydrologic models on the other hand to be used as part of
decision support systems. The discussion is based on results from two model
comparison studies. It becomes clear that none of the hydrologic models
tested fulfils all requirements in an optimal sense. Regarding the simulation
of water quality parameters like nitrogen leaching a high uncertainty needs
to be considered. Recommended for decision support is a hybrid metamodel
approach, which comprises a hydrologic model, empirical relationships for the
less dynamic processes and makes use of simulation results from complex
eco-hydrologic models through second-order modelling at a generalized level.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Arnold, J. G. and Fohrer, N.: SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling, Hydrol. Process., 19, 563–572, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Bárdossy, A. and Duckstein, L.: Fuzzy Rule-Based Modelling with Applications to Geophysical, Biological and Engineering Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 232~pp., 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Berlekamp, J., Lautenbach, S., Graf, N., Reimer, S., and Matthies, M.: Integration of MONERIS and GREAT-ER in the decision support system for the German Elbe river basin, Environ. Modell. Softw., 22, 239–247, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Fleming, M. and Neary, V.: Continuous Hydrologic Modeling Study with the Hydrologic Modeling System, J. Hydrol. Eng., 9, 175–183, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Franko, U., Oelschlägel, B., and Schenk, S.: Simulation of temperature-, water- and nitrogen dynamics using the model CANDY., Ecol. Model., 81, 213–222, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Haberlandt, U., Krysanova, V., Klöcking, B., Becker, A., and Bárdossy, A.: Development of a metamodel for large-scale assessment of water and nutrient fluxes – first components and initial tests for the Elbe River Basin, IAHS Publication, 268, 263–269, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Haberlandt, U., Krysanova, V., Franko, U., Kersebaum, C., and Beblik, A.: Modelling nitrogen leaching from agricultural soils – uncertainty assessment, upscaling and integration of model results, 3rd International Conference on Water Resources and Environmental Research, Dresden, 397–401, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Haberlandt, U., Buchwald, I., van der Heiden, S., and Verworn, A.: Requirements for hydrological models to be used as part of decision support systems in integrated water resources management, in: Int. Symposium on the Role of Hydrology in Water Resources Management, Capri, Italy, IAHS Publications, 327, 29–35, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Hartwich, R., Behrens, J., Eckelmann, W., Haase, G., Richter, A., Roeschmann, G., and Schmidt, R.: Bodenübersichtskarte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1:1 000 000 (BÜK1000), Karte mit Erläuterungen, Textlegende und Leitprofilen, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, 1995 (in German). </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Johnes, P. J.: Evaluation and management of the impact of land use change on the nitrogen and phosphorus load delivered to surface waters: the export coefficient modelling approach, J. Hydrol., 183, 323–349, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Kersebaum, K. C.: Application of a simple management model to simulate water and nitrogen dynamics, Ecol. Model., 81, 145–156, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Krysanova, V., Müller-Wohlfeil, D.-I., and Becker, A.: Development and test of a spatially distributed hydrological/water quality model for mesoscale watersheds, Ecol. Model., 106, 261–289, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Kunkel, R. and Wendland, F.: The GROWA98 model for water balance analysis in large river basins – the river Elbe case study, J. Hydrol., 259, 152–162, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Quinn, P. F., Hewett, C. J. M., and Dayawansa, N. D. K.: TOPCAT-NP: a minimum information requirement model for simulation of flow and nutrient transport from agricultural systems, Hydrol. Process., 22, 2565–2580, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Scheffer, F. and Schachtschabel, P.: Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde, 11~edn., Enke, Stuttgart, 1984 (in German). </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Schulla, J.: Hydrologische Modellierung von Flussgebieten zur Abschätzung der Folgen von Klimaänderungen., Züricher Geographische Schriften, Zürich, 1997 (in German). </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Shrestha, R. R., Bardossy, A., and Rode, M.: A hybrid deterministic-fuzzy rule based model for catchment scale nitrate dynamics, J. Hydrol., 342, 143–156, 2007. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

