<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-geosci.net/inc/adgeo/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Geosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-geosci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7340</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7359</eissn>
		<volume_number>19</volume_number>
		<volume_title>Geophysical monitoring of the near-surface by electromagnetic and other geophysical methods</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/adgeo-19-75-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-geosci.net/19/75/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-geosci.net/19/75/2008/adgeo-19-75-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-geosci.net/19/75/2008/adgeo-19-75-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>75</start_page>
	<end_page>82</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-11-14</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Integrated remote sensing techniques for the detection of buried archaeological adobe structures: preliminary results in Cahuachi (Peru)</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>N. Masini</name>
			<email>n.masini@ibam.cnr.it</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>E. Rizzo</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>R. Lasaponara</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>G. Orefici</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">CNR-IBAM (Istituto per i Beni Archeologici e Monumentali), C.da S. Loja 85050 Tito Scalo (PZ), Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">CNR-IMAA (Istituto di Metodologie di Analisi Ambientale), C.da S. Loja 85050 Tito Scalo (PZ), Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Centro de Estudios Arqueológicos Precolombinos (CEAP), Nasca, Peru</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">This paper is focused on the jointly use of satellite Quickbird (QB) images
and Ground Probing Radar (GPR) for assessing their capability in the detection
of archaeological adobe structures (sun-dried earth material). Such
detection is particularly complex. due to the low contrast generally existing between the
archaeological features and the background. Two significant test areas were
investigated in the Ceremonial Centre of Cahuachi (in the Nasca territory,
Southern Peru) dating back to 6th century BC to 4th century
AD.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Our results showed that both satellite and GPR data provided valuable indications for unearthing precious ancient remains.
Our preliminary analyses pointed out that the integrated use of non destructive
remote sensing techniques has high potentiality for its important scientific
implications and for its significant contributions  to cultural resource management.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text">Chianese, D., D&apos;Emilio, M., Di Salvia, S., Lapenna, V., Ragosta, M., and Rizzo, E.: Magnetic Mapping, Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys and Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements for the Study of the Archaeological Site of Serra di Vaglio (Southern Italy), J. Archaeol. Sci., 31, 633–643, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text">Kvamme, K., Ernenwein, E., Hargrave, M., Sever, T., Harmon, D., and Limp, F.: New Approaches to the Use and Integration of Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing for Historic Resource. Identification and Evaluation, Report of SERDP Project, SI-1263, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text">Lasaponara, R. and Masini, N.: Performance evaluation of data fusion algorithms for the detection of archaeological features by using satellite QuickBird data, in: Space to place, edited by: Campana, S. and Forte, M., Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Remote Sensing in Archaeology (Rome, 4–7~December~2006), BAR International Series, 13–20, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text">Lasaponara, R. and Masini, N.: On the potential of Quickbird data for archaeological prospection, Int. J. Remot. Sens., 27(15–16), 3607–3614, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text">Linford, N.: The application of geophysical methods to archaeological prospection, Report of Progress in Physics, 69, 2205–2257, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text">Lascano, E., Osella, A., De La Vega, M., Buscaglia, S., Senatore, X., and Lanata, J. L.: Geophysical prospection at Floridablanca archaeological site, San Julian Bay, Argentina, Archaeological Prospection, 10(3), 175–192, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text">Montoya, M., Grac\`&amp;#x0131;a, W., and Caidas, J.: Geolog\`&amp;#x0131;a de los Quadrangulos de Lomitas, Palpa, Nasca y Puquio, INGGEMET (Istituto Geologico Minero y Metallurgico), Lima, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text">Orefici, G.: Nasca, Archeologia per una ricostruzione storica, Jaca Book, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text">Orefici, G.: Nasca, Arte e società del popolo dei geoglifi, Jaca Book, Milano, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text">Rizzo, E., Chianese, D., and Lapenna, V.: Integration of magnetometric, gpr and geoelectric measurements applied to the archaeological site of Viggiano (Southern Italy, Agri Valley- Basilicata), Near Surface Geophysics, 3, 13–19, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text">Sandmeier, K. J.: Reflexw 2.1 Manual. Sandmeier Software: Zipser Strabe 1, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text">Silverman, H.: Cahuachi in the Ancient Nasca World, University Of Iowa Press, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text">Zhang, Y.: Understanding Image Fusion, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 657–661, 2004. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

