<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-geosci.net/inc/adgeo/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Geosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-geosci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7340</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7359</eissn>
		<volume_number>19</volume_number>
		<volume_title>Geophysical monitoring of the near-surface by electromagnetic and other geophysical methods</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/adgeo-19-45-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-geosci.net/19/45/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-geosci.net/19/45/2008/adgeo-19-45-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-geosci.net/19/45/2008/adgeo-19-45-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>45</start_page>
	<end_page>59</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-11-14</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Resistivity measured by direct and alternating current: why are they different?</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>V. Y. Zadorozhnaya</name>
			<email>valeriya@geoscience.org.za</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Council for Geoscience, 280 Pretoria str., Pretoria, 0184, South Africa</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Mathematical modeling of a little known model of IP referred to as &quot;induced
polarization caused by constrictivity of pores&quot; was developed. Polarization
occurs in all types of rocks if surface areas and transfer numbers are
different for connected pores. The duration of the polarization process
depends on two parameters: pore radii of connected capillaries and transfer
numbers. During the polarization process all contacts between pores of
different transfer numbers will be blocked and the electrical current will
flow through the remaining canals. Two phenomena control the amplitude of
potential difference at time-on: 1. Successive blockage of pores increases
the resistivity of sediments and results in increased measured potential
difference. 2. Excess concentration of electrolyte at the boundaries between
pores with different radii provides an additional potential. The amplitude
of the potential difference (voltage) of such rocks not only depends on
solutions filling pore spaces, porosity and tourtuosity of pores channels,
but also on ion mobility, diffusion coefficient, and difference of transfer
numbers. During time-on a voltage is occurred due to flowing current
&lt;i&gt;U&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;curr&lt;/sub&gt; (&lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;) and excess concentration &lt;i&gt;U&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;excess&lt;/sub&gt; (&lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;) at the contacts.
However during the time-off only the excess of concentration &lt;i&gt;U&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;excess&lt;/sub&gt; (&lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;) is involved in the diffusion process which tends to level the ion
concentration along the pores. It was found that the measured chargeability
is proportional to the porosity. Blockage of pores and excess/loss ions at
the contacted pores control this physical parameter.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
However the relationship between resistivity and porosity is very
complicated. Mathematical modeling and laboratory measurements both
confirmed the membrane IP effect diminishing with increasing salinity of
fluid filled pores of rocks. Membrane polarization does not exist on high
frequency of electrical current. As a result the resistivity measured by
direct and alternating current is different. The new algorithm was tested on
laboratory measurements data showing its good agreement with theory. The
calculation of pore size distribution using IP laboratory data has been
presented. The definition of the membrane IP effect is: &quot;Membrane IP is the
successive blockage of inter-pore connections due to the excess distribution
of ions during current flow&quot;.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text">Anderson, L. A. and Keller, G. V.: A study in induced polarization, Geophysics, 24(5), 848–864, 1964. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text">De beer, F., Zadorozhnaya, V., Middleton, M., and Schoeman, C.: Neutron imaging in South Africa adds value to geosciences and petrophysics, 19th geophysical conference and exhibition, Perth, Western Australia, 18–22, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text">Keller, G. V.: Analysis of some electrical transient measurements on igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks, Chap. 7, in: Overvoltage research and geophysical applications, edited by: Wait, J. R., 92–111, New York, Pergamon, Press, Inc., 1959. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text">Keller, G. V. and Licastro, P. H.: Dielectric constant and electrical resistivity of natural state cores, US Geol. Survey Bull., 1052, 257–285, 1959. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text">Jost, W.: Diffusion in Solids, Liquids, Gases: New York, Academic Press, Inc., 558 p., 1952. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text">Kobranova, V. N.: Petrophysics, Nedra, Moscow, 392 p., 1986, in Russian. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text">Koshlyakov, N. S., Gliner, E. B., and Smirnov, M. M.: Partial Differentiation of Equations in Mathematical Physics, Vysshaya shkola., Moscow, 710 p., 1970, in Russian. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text">Marshal, D. J. and Madden, T. R.: Induced Polarization, a Study of its cases, Geophysics, 24(4), 790–816, 1959. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text">Pipe, H., Riere, L., and Schopper, J. R.: Theory of semi-similar network structures in sedimentary and igneous rocks and their investigations with microscopical and physical methods, J. Microscopy, 2, 121–147, 1987. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text">Schön, J.: Physical Properties of Rocks. Fundamental and Principles of Petrophysics. Handbook of Geophysical Exploration. Seismic Exploration, Volume 18, New York, Pergamon, Press, Inc., 583 p., ISBN 0 08 0410081, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text">Titiov, K., Komarov, V., Tarasov, V., and Levitski, A.: Theoretical and experimental study of time domain-induced polarization in water saturated sands, J. Appl. Geophys., 50, 417–433, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text">Ward, S.: Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods, in: Geotechnical and environmental geophysics, Investigation in Geophysics, No 5, edited by: Ward, S., SEG, 169–189, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text">Zadorozhnaya, V. Y. and Hauger, M. E.: Membrane polarization on rocks and measured resistivity, in: Earth Elecrtomagnetic Investigations, edited by: Spichak, V. V., III International School-Seminar on Electromagnetic Sounding of the Earth (EMS-2007), Moscow, Russia, Lecture, 149–167, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text">Zadorozhnaya, V. Y. and Hauger, M. E.: Mathematic simulation of the membrane polarization occurring in rocks due to applied electrical current, Physics of the Solid Earth, in press, 2008a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text">Zadorozhnaya V. Y. and Hauger, M. E.: Polarization processes in rocks and measured electrical resistivity, Geophysical Prospecting, in press, 2008b. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

