<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-geosci.net/inc/adgeo/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Geosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-geosci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7340</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7359</eissn>
		<volume_number>16</volume_number>
		<volume_title>Observation, Prediction and Verification of Precipitation (EGU Session 2007)</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/adgeo-16-97-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/97/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/97/2008/adgeo-16-97-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/97/2008/adgeo-16-97-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>97</start_page>
	<end_page>107</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-04-09</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Estimation of the systematic error of precipitation and humidity in the MM5 model</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Ivanov</name>
			<email>svvivo@te.net.ua</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>C. Simmer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Palamarchuk</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>S. Bachner</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Odessa State Environmental University, Ukraine</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Meteorological Institute University Bonn, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">To comprehensively diagnose model capabilities in simulating atmospheric
flow including the relevant microphysical processes, the main prognostic
fields of the MM5 model are compared with ERA40 reanalysis data. This
approach allows to identify and compare meaningful features of model
parameterization schemes and to quantify model errors. Various combinations
of schemes for cumulus convection, planetary boundary layer (PBL),
microphysics and radiative transfer are used in order to identify those
combinations which produce the closest resemblance between model state and
reanalysis. The spatial structure of systematic errors, both horizontal and
vertical will be described and geographical regions and synoptic situations
will be identified, which are associated with pronounced systematic model
deviations. The study focused on precipitation and humidity fields as well
as on the main thermodynamic atmospheric variables on a coarse resolution
grid (about 80 km) over the North Atlantic - Europe region. Our results
identify advantages and shortcomings of the various parameterization
schemes. They also indicate that, in general, the combination of best
schemes does not result in optimal simulations of a particular variable.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text">Austin, P. M.: Relation between measured radar reflectivity and surface rainfall, Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 1053&amp;ndash;1070, 1987. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text">Berne, A. and Uijlenhoet, R.: Path-averaged rainfall estimation using microwave links: Uncertainty due to spatial rainfall variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L07403, doi:10.1029/2007GL29409, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text">Bousquet, O., Lin, C. A., and Zawadski, I.: Analysis of scale dependence of quantitative precipitation forecast verification: A case-study over the Mackenzie river basin, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 2107&amp;ndash;2125, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text">Brewster, K.: Phase-correcting data assimilation and application to storm-scale numerical weather prediction, Part I: Method description and simulation testing, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 480&amp;ndash;492, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text">Buizza, R., Houtekamer, P. L., Toth, Z., Pellerin, G., Wei, M. and Zhu, Y.: A comparison of the ECMWF, MSC and NCEP global ensemble prediction systems, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1076&amp;ndash;1097, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text">Grell, G. A., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D. R.: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale model (MM5), NCAR Technical Note, 398, 117 pp., 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text">Hack, J. J., Boville, B. A., Briegleb, B. P., Kiehl, J. T., Rasch ,P. J. and Williamson, D. L.: Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM2), NCAR Technical Note, 382, 120 pp., 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text">Hagemann, S., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L., and Kirchner, I.: Validation of the hydrological cycle of ERA40, ERA40 Project Report Series, 24, 42 pp., 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text">Harlim, J., Oczkowski, M., Yorke, J. A., Kalnay, E., and Hunt, B.: Convex error growth patterns in a global weather model, Phys. Rev. Let., 94, 228501, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett94, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text">Hoffman, R. N., Liu, Z., Lois, J.-F., and Grassotti, C.: Distortion representation of forecast errors, Mon. Weather Rev., 123, 2758&amp;ndash;2770, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text">Hong, S.-Y. and Pan, H.-L.: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2322&amp;ndash;2339, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text">Ivanov, S. and Palamarchuk, J.: Fine-scale precipitation structure of a cold front and the problem of the representativeness error, Adv. Geosci., 10, 3&amp;ndash;8, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text">Janjic, Z. I.: The step-mountain Eta coordinate model: Further development of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulent closure scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 927&amp;ndash;945, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text">John, V. O. and Soden, B. J.: Temperature and humidity in IPCC AR4 models: An assessment using AIRS observations, WGNE/PCMDI systematic errors workshop abstracts, p.126, San Francisco, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text">Jung, T.: Systematic errors of the atmospheric circulation in the ECMWF forecasting system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 1045&amp;ndash;1073, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text">Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models, Am. Meteorol. Soc., 246 pp, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text">Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough S.: A. Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16 663&amp;ndash;16 682, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text">Orrell, D., Smith, L., Barkmeijer, J., and Palmer, T.N.: Model error in weather forecasting, Nonlinear Proc. In Geophys., 8, 357&amp;ndash;371, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text">Pierce, D. W., Barnett, T. P., Fetzer, E. J., and Gleckler, P. J.: Three-dimensional tropospheric water vapour in coupled climate models compared with observations from the AIRS satellite system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L21701, doi:10.1029/2006GL027060, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text">Rabier, F., McNally, A., Andersson, E., Courtier, P., Unden, P., Eyre, J., Hollingsworth, A., and Bouttier, F.: The ECMWF implementation of three-dimensional variational assimilation (3D-Var), Part II: Structure function, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 124, 1809&amp;ndash;1829, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text">Rivals, H., Cammas, J. P., and Renfrew, I. A.: Secondary cyclogenesis: the initiation of a frontal wave observed over the Eastern Atlantic, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 124, 243&amp;ndash;267, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text">Snyder, C. and Joly, A.: Development of perturbations within growing baroclinic waves, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 124, 1961&amp;ndash;1983, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text">Wei, M. and Toth, Z.: A new measure of ensemble performance: Perturbation versus error correlation analysis (PECA), Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 1549&amp;ndash;1565, 2003. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

