<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-geosci.net/inc/adgeo/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Geosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-geosci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7340</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7359</eissn>
		<volume_number>16</volume_number>
		<volume_title>Observation, Prediction and Verification of Precipitation (EGU Session 2007)</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/adgeo-16-33-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/33/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/33/2008/adgeo-16-33-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-geosci.net/16/33/2008/adgeo-16-33-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>33</start_page>
	<end_page>41</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-04-09</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Process-oriented statistical-dynamical evaluation of LM precipitation forecasts</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Claußnitzer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>I. Langer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. Névir</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>E. Reimer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>U. Cubasch</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institut f¨ur Meteorologie, Freie Universität Berlin Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 6-10, D-12165 Berlin, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The objective of this study is the scale dependent evaluation of precipitation forecasts of the Lokal-Modell (LM) from the German Weather Service in relation to dynamical and cloud parameters. For this purpose the newly designed Dynamic State Index (&lt;i&gt;DSI&lt;/i&gt;) is correlated with clouds and precipitation. The &lt;i&gt;DSI&lt;/i&gt; quantitatively describes the deviation and relative distance from a
stationary and adiabatic solution of the primitive
equations.
A case study and statistical analysis of clouds and precipitation demonstrates the availability of the &lt;i&gt;DSI&lt;/i&gt; as a dynamical threshold parameter. This confirms the importance of imbalances of the atmospheric flow field, which dynamically induce the generation of rainfall.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Banacos, P. C. and Schultz D. M.: The use of moisture flux convergence in forecasting convective initiation: historical and operational perspectives, Weather and Forecasting, 20, 351&amp;ndash;366, 2005.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Berger, F. H.: Die Bestimmung des Einflusses von hohen Wolken auf das Strahlungsfeld und das Klima durch Analyse von NOAA AVHRR-Daten, Ph.D. Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Wiss. Met. Abh., Neue Folge Serie A6, 3, 1992.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Doms, G. and Schättler, U.: The nonhydrostatic limit-area model LM (Lokal-Modell) of DWD. Part 1: Scientific Documentation, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach (available from: http://www.cosmo-model.org), 1999.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Houze, R. A., Jr.: Mesoscale Convective Systems, Rev. Geophysics, 42,~RG4003, doi:10.1029/2004RG000150, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Langer, I. and Reimer, E.: Separation of convective and stratiform precipitation for a precipitation analysis of the local model of the German Weather Service, Adv. Geosci., 10, 159&amp;ndash;165, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Langer, I., Reimer, E. and Oestreich, A.: First results: Cloud classification from Meteosat data for separation of convective and stratiform precipitation, Meteorol. Zeitschrift, 17(1), 29&amp;ndash;27, 2008.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Lovejoy, S. and Schertzer, D.: Multifractals and rain, In: New uncertainty concepts in Hydrology and Hydrological modelling, edited by: Z. W. Kundzwewics, 62&amp;ndash;103, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Névir, P.: Ertel&apos;s vorticity theorems, the particle relabelling symmetry and the energy-vorticity theory of fluid mechanics, Meteorol. Zeitschrift, 13(6), 485&amp;ndash;498, 2004.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Olsson, J., Niemczynomicz, J., and Berndtsson, R.: Fractal Analysis of high-resolution rainfall time series, J. Geophys. Res.,~98(D12), 23 265&amp;ndash;23 274, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Palmén, E. and Holopainen, E. O.: Divergence, vertical velocity and conversion between potential and kinetic energy in an extratropical disturbance, Geophysica, 8, 89&amp;ndash;113, 1962. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Peters, O. and Christensen, K.: Rain viewed as relaxation events, J. Hydrol., 328, 46&amp;ndash;55, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Reimer, E. and Scherer, B.: An operational meteorological diagnostic system for regional air pollution analysis and long term modelling,    In: Air Pollution Modelling and its Application IX, edited by: H. v. Dop, and G. Kallos (Eds.), NATO Challenges of Modern Society, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, New York, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Febres de Power, B., Sharifi, M. S., and Georgakos, K. P.: Chaos in rainfall, Water Resour. Res.,~25(7), 1667&amp;ndash;1675, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Rose, B. E. J. and Lin, C. A.: Precipitation from vertical motion: a statistical diagnostic scheme, Int. J. Climatol., 23, 903&amp;ndash;919, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Schär, C.: A generalization of Bernoulli&apos;s theorem, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 1437&amp;ndash;1443, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Scherhag, R.: Wetteranalyse und Wetterprognose, Springer, Berlin, 1948. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Sivakumar, B.: Is a chaotic multifractal approach for rainfall possible?, Hydrol. Process.,~15, 943&amp;ndash;955, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Spar, J.: A suggested technique for quantitative precipitation forecasting, Mon. Wea. Rev., 81(8), 217&amp;ndash;221, 1953. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Tessier, Y., Lovejoy, S., and Schertzer, D.: Universal multifractals: theory and observations for rain and cloud, J. Appl. Meteorol., 32, 223&amp;ndash;250, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parametrization in large-scale models, Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1779&amp;ndash;1800, 1989.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Weber, T. and Névir, P.: Storm tracks and cyclone development using the theoretical concept of the Dynamic State Index (DSI), Tellus A, 60(1), 1&amp;ndash;10, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00272.x, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Xie, P. and Arkin, P. A.: An intercomparison of gauge observations and satellite estimates of monthly precipitation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 1143&amp;ndash;1160, 1995.  </reference>
	</references>
</article>

