<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-geosci.net/inc/adgeo/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Geosciences</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-geosci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7340</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7359</eissn>
		<volume_number>10</volume_number>
		<volume_title>Observation, Prediction and Verification of Precipitation (EGU Session 2006)</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2007</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/adgeo-10-3-2007</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-geosci.net/10/3/2007/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-geosci.net/10/3/2007/adgeo-10-3-2007.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-geosci.net/10/3/2007/adgeo-10-3-2007.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>3</start_page>
	<end_page>8</end_page>
	<publication_date>2007-04-26</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Fine-scale precipitation structure of a cold front and the problem of the representativeness error</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Ivanov</name>
			<email>svvivo@te.net.ua</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Palamarchuk</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Odessa State Environmental University, Ukraine</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The proper knowledge of spatial precipitation structure is important as much
as that of microphysics processes for reliable quantitative precipitation
forecasts. This study considers some aspects of how precipitation is
organized on meso- and fine-scales, within a cold front line and how
moisture transport is driven by these structures. Also, a spectral space
vision of the representativeness error is proposed, which highlights
uncertainties arising on the scales lying between resolutions of different
networks. This approach is used to explain an improper simulation of
humidity and precipitation fields in models whose resolution is coarser than
the scales being considered.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Austin, P. M.: Relation between measured radar reflectivity and surface rainfall, Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 1053&amp;ndash;1070, 1987. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Bormann, N., Saarinen, S., Kelly, G., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The spatial structure of observation errors in atmospheric motion vectors from geostationary satellite data, Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 706&amp;ndash;718, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Browning, K. A.: Mesoscale structure of rain system in the British Isles, J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan, 11, 52, 314&amp;ndash;327, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Claussen, M.: Estimation of areally averaged surface fluxes, Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 54, 387&amp;ndash;410, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Chen, Q. and Kuo, Y.: A harmonic-sine series expansion and its application to partitioning and reconstruction problems in a limited area, Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 91&amp;ndash;112, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Collier, C. G.: Accuracy of radar estimates by radar. Part I: Calibration by telemetring raingauges, J. Hydrol., 83, 207&amp;ndash;223, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Crum, T. D., Saffle, R. E., and Wilson, J. W.: An update on the NEXRAD program and future WSR-88D support to operations, Wea. Forecast., 13, 253&amp;ndash;262, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Evans, K. F. and Wiscombe, W. J.: An algorithm for generating stochastic cloud fields from radar profile statistics, Atmos. Res., 72, 263&amp;ndash;289, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Eyre, J. P.: Variational assimilation of remotely-sensed observations of the atmosphere, J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan, 75, 331&amp;ndash;338, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Fraedrich, K. and Ziehmann-Schlumbohm, C.: Predictability experiments with persistence forecasts in a red-noise atmosphere, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 120, 387&amp;ndash;428, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Gilmore, M. S., Straka, J. M., and Rasmussen, E. N.: Precipitation uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle parameters within a simple microphysics scheme, Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2610&amp;ndash;2627, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Hobbs, P. V., Matejka, T. J., Herzegh, P. H., Locatelly, J. D., and Houze, R. A.: The meso-scale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. Part I. A case study of a cold front, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 568&amp;ndash;596, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Hollingsworth, A. and Lonnberg, P.: The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data, Tellus, 38A, 111&amp;ndash;136, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Houze, R. A. and Hobbs, P. V.: Organization and structure of precipitating cloud systems, Adv. Geophys., 24, 225&amp;ndash;315, 1982. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Jones, C. D. and Macpherson, B.: A latent heat nudging scheme for the assimilation of precipitation data into an operational Mesoscale model, Meteorol. Appl,, 4, 269&amp;ndash;277, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Jung, T.: Systematic errors of the atmospheric circulation in the ECMWF forecasting system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 1045&amp;ndash;1073, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Kreitzberg, C. W. and Brown H. A.: Mesoscale weather systems within an occlusion, J. Appl. Meteorol., 9, 417&amp;ndash;432, 1970. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Mahfouf, J.-F. and Noilhan, J.: Comparative study of various formulations of evaporation from bare soil using in-situ data, J. Appl. Meteorol., 30, 1354&amp;ndash;1365, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Mandelbrot, B. B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W H Freeman, New York, USA, 460 p., 1982. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Palmer, T. N.: A nonlinear dynamical perspective on model error: A proposal for non-local stochastic-dynamic parameterization in weather and climate prediction models, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 127, 279&amp;ndash;304, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Reisner, J., Rasmussen R. J., and Bruintjes R. T.: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter stroms using the MM5 mesoscale model, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124B, 1071&amp;ndash;1107, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Roache, P. J.: Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics, J. Fluid Mech., 29, 123&amp;ndash;160, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Roache, P. J.: Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Scheirer, R. and Schmidt, S.: CLABAUTAIR: a new algorithm for retrieving three dimensional cloud structure from airborne microphysical measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2333&amp;ndash;2340, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Schultz, P.: An explicit cloud physics parameterization for operational numerical weather prediction, Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 3331&amp;ndash;3343, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Tao, W.-K. and Simpson, J.: Goddard Cumulus Ensemble Model. Part I: Model Description. Terrestrial, Atmos. Oceanic Sci., 4, 35&amp;ndash;72, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Tanaka, H. L. and Kimura, K.: Time series analysis of natural variability in barotropic energy of the atmosphere with ECMWF global analysis, J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan, 76, 267&amp;ndash;274, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Turcotte, D. L.: Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, U.K., 412p., 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Tustison, B., Harris, D., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: Scale issues in verification of precipitation forecasts, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 11 775&amp;ndash;11 784, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Venema, V., Meyer, S., Gimeno García, S., Kniffka, A., Simmer, C., Crewell, S., Löhnert, U., Trautmann, U., and Macke, A.: Surrogate cloud fields generated with the Iterative Amplitude Adapted Fourier Transform algorithm, Tellus 58A, 104&amp;ndash;120, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Zehnder, J. A.: A comparison of convergence- and surface-flux-based convective parameterizations with applications to tropical cyclogenesis, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 283&amp;ndash;301, 2001. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

